Bangholme vs Chelsea Heights
Chelsea Heights is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 71 in Bangholme. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bangholme, the large majority of households are people living alone. In Chelsea Heights, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Chelsea Heights: a median of $1.01 million, against $560,000 in Bangholme, and rent is higher there too. Chelsea Heights is closer to the city centre: 36.8 km, against 46.3 km. On these figures, Bangholme tends to suit people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Chelsea Heights suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Chelsea Heights
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 2)
- is already more of a family suburb (67% vs 20%)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- But Bangholme has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 79%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Bangholme has cheaper houses ($560,000 vs $1,009,250)
- Chelsea Heights leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 103%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bangholme has cheaper rent ($176/wk vs $412/wk)
- Chelsea Heights leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Chelsea Heights
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (44 min vs 62 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (36.8 km vs 46.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Chelsea Heights
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (21% vs 2%)
- carries lower crime risk (56/100 vs 83/100)
- But Bangholme has more residents already 65 and over (66% vs 18%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Chelsea Heights
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (1.1% vs -4.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bangholme and Chelsea Heights drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chelsea Heights has more residents (5,393 vs 749); Chelsea Heights has higher household incomes ($97,084 vs $33,488).
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 749 | 5,393 +620% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -4.5% | +1.1% |
| Median age | 71 | 40 |
| Median household income | $33,488/yr | $97,084/yr +190% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $176/wk | $412/wk +134% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $560,000 | $1,009,250 |
| Median unit price | — | $746,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 22 days from 22 sales |
Zoning mix
Bangholme has more rural and farming land (53% vs 0%); Chelsea Heights has more commercially zoned land (13% vs 0%).
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 53% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 44% | 37% |
| Residential | 0% | 44% |
| Commercial | 0% | 13% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 4% |
| Industrial | 2% same for both | |
| Other and special use | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 594 across Greater Dandenong | 465 across Kingston (Vic.) |
| Approvals change year on year | -34% | -36% |
Gross rental yield
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.3% $792/wk on $960K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 1% of VIC | Higher than 67% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 29% of VIC | Higher than 90% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 39% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 96% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 85% of VIC |
Liveability
Chelsea Heights is more walkable (69 vs 0); Chelsea Heights scores higher overall (58 vs 18).
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | B |
| Score | 18/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Bangholme carries more bushfire risk (28 vs 0); Bangholme carries more crime risk (83 vs 56).
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 28/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 83/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 61/100 | High 79/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 17 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Bangholme
- Cornish College Independent · Combined below peers
Schools in Chelsea Heights
- Chelsea Heights Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 8 |
| Childcare | 2 same for both | |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 4 | 0 |
Mobility
Bangholme sits further from the CBD (46.3 km vs 36.8 km).
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 69/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 46.3 km +21% vs other | 36.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 62 min | 44 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 29.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 111.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.0% postcode 3175 | 1.1% postcode 3196 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 29 postcode 3175 | 25 postcode 3196 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.9%).
Setting
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.1 km | 2.2 km 2.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 59/100 | 90/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 24% 589 premises | 50% 2,428 premises |
Climate
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm | 644 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 26.0°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 6.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,123/yr | $1,940/yr |
| Council | Greater Dandenong | Kingston (Vic.) |
Federal electorate
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Isaacs same for both | |
| Member | Mark Dreyfus same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bangholme | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bangholme
Other comparisons with Chelsea Heights
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.