Bangholme vs Aspendale Gardens
Aspendale Gardens is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 71 in Bangholme. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bangholme, the large majority of households are people living alone. In Aspendale Gardens, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Aspendale Gardens: a median of $1.24 million, against $560,000 in Bangholme, and rent is higher there too. Aspendale Gardens is closer to the city centre: 36.4 km, against 46.3 km. On these figures, Bangholme tends to suit people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Aspendale Gardens suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Aspendale Gardens
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (77% vs 20%)
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 83/100)
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 2)
- But Bangholme has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 84%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Bangholme has cheaper houses ($560,000 vs $1,240,000)
- Aspendale Gardens leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 103%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Bangholme
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($176/wk vs $496/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Aspendale Gardens
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (63/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (43 min vs 62 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (36.4 km vs 46.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Aspendale Gardens
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (63/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (16% vs 2%)
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 83/100)
- But Bangholme has more residents already 65 and over (66% vs 17%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bangholme and Aspendale Gardens drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Aspendale Gardens has more residents (6,427 vs 749); Aspendale Gardens has higher household incomes ($114,920 vs $33,488).
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 749 | 6,427 +758% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -4.5% | -1.6% |
| Median age | 71 | 43 |
| Median household income | $33,488/yr | $114,920/yr +243% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $176/wk | $496/wk +182% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $560,000 | $1,240,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $693,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 24 days from 15 sales |
Zoning mix
Bangholme has more rural and farming land (53% vs 9%).
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 0% | 53% |
| Rural and farming | 53% | 9% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 44% | 32% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 5% |
| Other and special use | 2% | 0% |
| Industrial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 594 across Greater Dandenong | 465 across Kingston (Vic.) |
| Approvals change year on year | -34% | -36% |
Gross rental yield
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.0% $850/wk on $1.09M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 1% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 29% of VIC | Higher than 88% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 32% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 91% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 95% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 70% of VIC |
Liveability
Aspendale Gardens is more walkable (63 vs 0); Aspendale Gardens scores higher overall (68 vs 18).
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | A |
| Score | 18/100 | 68/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Bangholme carries more bushfire risk (28 vs 0); Bangholme carries more crime risk (83 vs 26).
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 28/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 83/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 61/100 | High 87/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 17 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Bangholme
- Cornish College Independent · Combined below peers
Schools in Aspendale Gardens
- Aspendale Gardens Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 same for both | |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 5 |
| Childcare | 2 | 5 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 4 | 1 |
Mobility
Bangholme sits further from the CBD (46.3 km vs 36.4 km).
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 63/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 46.3 km +21% vs other | 36.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 62 min | 43 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 29.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 47.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.0% postcode 3175 | 1.7% postcode 3195 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 29 postcode 3175 | 31 postcode 3195 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.9%).
Setting
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre same for both | |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.1 km | 1.8 km 2.1 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 59/100 | 89/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the curb |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 24% 589 premises | 45% 2,103 premises |
Climate
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm | 644 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 26.0°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 6.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,123/yr | $1,940/yr |
| Council | Greater Dandenong | Kingston (Vic.) |
Federal electorate
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Isaacs same for both | |
| Member | Mark Dreyfus same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bangholme | Aspendale Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bangholme
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bangholme
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.