Bangham vs Pooginagoric
Bangham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 51 in Pooginagoric. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Bangham tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bangham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (14 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bangham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $125/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Pooginagoric
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (192 min vs 204 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (287.8 km vs 305.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Bangham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (24.6% vs -11.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bangham and Pooginagoric drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bangham has more residents (81 vs 55); Pooginagoric rents higher ($125/wk vs $100/wk).
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81 +32% vs other | 55 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +24.6% | -11.3% |
| Median age | 43 | 51 |
| Median household income | $94,224/yr | $100,724/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $100/wk | $125/wk +25% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Zoning mix
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 94% | 100% |
| Environmental | 6% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 12 across Tatiara same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -33% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 73% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 50% of SA | Higher than 31% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 5% of SA | Higher than 4% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 23% of SA | Higher than 39% of SA |
Liveability
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Bangham carries more bushfire risk (54 vs 0).
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 54/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | — | Moderate 44/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 1 |
Mobility
Bangham sits further from the CBD (305.1 km vs 287.8 km).
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 305.1 km +6% vs other | 287.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 204 min | 192 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 5268 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 58 postcode 5268 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.5%).
Setting
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 104 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 92 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 27/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 13 premises | 0% 22 premises |
Council rates
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,656/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tatiara same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bangham | Pooginagoric | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bangham
Other comparisons with Pooginagoric
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.