Bald Hills vs Lochiel
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Lochiel: a median of $1.2 million, against $922,000 in Bald Hills, though rent is higher in Bald Hills. On these figures, Bald Hills tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bald Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($922,500 vs $1,200,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Lochiel
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 25%)
- has cheaper rent ($260/wk vs $375/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bald Hills
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (369 min vs 375 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (529.8 km vs 537 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bald Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bald Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (22.1% vs 16.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bald Hills and Lochiel drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Bald Hills rents higher ($375/wk vs $260/wk); Lochiel has more residents (411 vs 321).
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321 | 411 +28% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +22.1% | +16.1% |
| Median age | 44 same for both | |
| Median household income | $77,324/yr | $82,472/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $375/wk +31% vs other | $260/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $922,500 | $1,200,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Bald Hills has more land zoned for conservation (47% vs 14%); Lochiel has more rural and farming land (85% vs 53%).
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 53% | 85% |
| Environmental | 47% | 14% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Bega Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -32% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 48% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 50% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 42% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 50% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 40% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
Liveability
Bald Hills is more walkable (17 vs 0).
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Bald Hills carries more bushfire risk (48 vs 31).
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 48/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Crime | Low 17/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 14 |
Mobility
Lochiel sits further from the CBD (537 km vs 529.8 km).
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 17/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 529.8 km | 537 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 369 min | 375 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2549 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 2549 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.0%).
Setting
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 106 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 141 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.5 km | 10.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 24/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 120 premises | 0% 94 premises |
Climate
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 768 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,767/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bega Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Eden-monaro same for both | |
| Member | Kristy Mcbain same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bald Hills | Lochiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bald Hills
Other comparisons with Lochiel
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.