Bakers Swamp vs Mumbil
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bakers Swamp, most households are people living alone. In Mumbil, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Bakers Swamp tends to suit people living alone, while Mumbil suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Bakers Swamp carries lower crime risk (54/100 vs 80/100)
- Mumbil has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Bakers Swamp leaves renters under less rental stress (10% vs 16%)
- Mumbil has cheaper rent ($140/wk vs $180/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Bakers Swamp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a shorter drive in (272 min vs 281 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Bakers Swamp carries lower crime risk (54/100 vs 80/100)
- Mumbil has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 15%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bakers Swamp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (13.2% vs 2.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Bakers Swamp and Mumbil drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mumbil has more residents (298 vs 60); Bakers Swamp has higher household incomes ($93,132 vs $44,928).
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60 | 298 +397% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +13.2% | +2.4% |
| Median age | 49 | 48 |
| Median household income | $93,132/yr +52% vs other | $44,928/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $180/wk +22% vs other | $140/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.4%).
Property market
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $210,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $870,000 | — |
Zoning mix
Bakers Swamp has more rural and farming land (99% vs 79%); Mumbil has more land zoned for conservation (16% vs 0%).
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 79% |
| Environmental | 0% | 16% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 3% |
| Residential | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 405 across Dubbo same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -12% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 4% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 60% of NSW | Higher than 7% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 37% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 93% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 8% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 36% of NSW | Higher than 48% of NSW |
Liveability
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Mumbil carries more bushfire risk (41 vs 20); Mumbil carries more crime risk (80 vs 54).
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 20/100 | Moderate 41/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 54/100 | High 80/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Bakers Swamp
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mumbil
- Mumbil Public School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 4 |
| Waterways | 12 | 36 |
Mobility
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 338.3 km | 338 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 272 min | 281 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 2820 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 50 postcode 2820 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.7%).
Setting
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 448 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 453 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 25/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 23 premises | 0% 174 premises |
Climate
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 641 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.0°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,233/yr same for both | |
| Council | Dubbo same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calare same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Gee same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Bakers Swamp | Mumbil | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bakers Swamp
Mumbil
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Bakers Swamp
Other comparisons with Mumbil
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.