Back Valley vs Waitpinga
Back Valley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 47 against 51 in Waitpinga. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Back Valley, most households are couple families. In Waitpinga, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Back Valley tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Back Valley carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 62/100)
- Waitpinga has more parks and reserves (15 vs 9)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Waitpinga
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 26%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $310/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Back Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (93.8 km vs 96 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Back Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Waitpinga
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (19.5% vs 9.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Back Valley and Waitpinga drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Waitpinga has more residents (374 vs 176); Waitpinga has higher household incomes ($78,780 vs $62,504).
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176 | 374 +112% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.3% | +19.5% |
| Median age | 47 | 51 |
| Median household income | $62,504/yr | $78,780/yr +26% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $310/wk +19% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,242,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $350,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 101 days from 3 sales |
Zoning mix
Back Valley has more rural and farming land (100% vs 89%); Waitpinga has more land zoned for conservation (10% vs 0%).
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 89% |
| Environmental | 0% | 10% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 347 across Victor Harbor same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -26% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $590/wk on $812K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 30% of SA | Higher than 54% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 40% of SA | Higher than 20% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 71% of SA | Higher than 75% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 41% of SA |
Liveability
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Waitpinga carries more bushfire risk (27 vs 0); Waitpinga carries more crime risk (62 vs 37).
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Crime | Low 37/100 | Moderate 62/100 |
| Flood | — | Low 13/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 15 |
| Beaches | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 0 | 5 |
Mobility
Waitpinga sits further from the CBD (96 km vs 93.8 km).
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 93.8 km | 96 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 92 min | 88 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 5211 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 5211 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.3%).
Setting
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 97 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 100 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 9.3 km | 3.7 km 3.9 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 37/100 | 55/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 10% 91 premises | 37% 198 premises |
Climate
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 786 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,533/yr same for both | |
| Council | Victor Harbor same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Back Valley | Waitpinga | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Back Valley
Other comparisons with Waitpinga
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.