Back Forest vs Jaspers Brush
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Back Forest tends to suit families with children and couples, while Jaspers Brush suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Back Forest
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 40/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 70%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Jaspers Brush
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (44% vs 80%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Back Forest
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($252/wk vs $475/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 25%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Jaspers Brush
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 5/100)
- has a shorter drive in (121 min vs 134 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (150 km vs 155.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Jaspers Brush
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 5/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 23%)
- But Back Forest carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 40/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Back Forest
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (8.3% vs 0.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Back Forest and Jaspers Brush drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Jaspers Brush has more residents (362 vs 91); Jaspers Brush rents higher ($475/wk vs $252/wk).
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91 | 362 +298% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.3% | +0.8% |
| Median age | 56 | 55 |
| Median household income | $71,448/yr | $98,280/yr +38% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $252/wk | $475/wk +88% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (31.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $2,125,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 85% | 93% |
| Environmental | 14% | 5% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 854 across Shoalhaven same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -10% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 35% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 10% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 87% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
Liveability
Jaspers Brush is more walkable (14 vs 5).
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Jaspers Brush carries more bushfire risk (15 vs 0); Jaspers Brush carries more crime risk (40 vs 18).
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Crime | Low 18/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 5 |
Mobility
Back Forest sits further from the CBD (155.6 km vs 150 km).
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 5/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 155.6 km +4% vs other | 150 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 134 min | 121 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.4% postcode 2535 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 2535 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (63.9%).
Setting
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 107 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 49 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.4 km | 9.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 33 premises | 0% 174 premises |
Climate
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,501/yr same for both | |
| Council | Shoalhaven same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gilmore same for both | |
| Member | Fiona Phillips same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Back Forest | Jaspers Brush | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Back Forest
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Back Forest
Other comparisons with Jaspers Brush
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.