Avoca vs Sharon
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Sharon, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Sharon: a median of $800,000, against $688,000 in Avoca. On these figures, Avoca tends to suit people living alone, while Sharon suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sharon
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 69/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (75% vs 49%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (99% vs 77%)
- But Avoca has more childcare (4 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Avoca
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($687,500 vs $800,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Avoca
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (25% vs 7%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Avoca
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (356.9 km vs 361.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Avoca
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (23% vs 1%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (31% vs 23%)
- But Sharon carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Avoca and Sharon drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Avoca has more residents (4,912 vs 1,209); Sharon has higher household incomes ($71,500 vs $60,788).
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,912 +75% vs other | 1,209 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.2% | — |
| Median age | 48 | 47 |
| Median household income | $60,788/yr | $71,500/yr +18% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $305/wk +2% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $687,500 | $800,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $367,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 37 days from 26 sales | 45 days from 16 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
44 vs 16 sales
27 vs 22 sales
5 vs 6 sales
Development activity
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 997 across Bundaberg same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -45% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $660/wk on $734K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 26% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of QLD | Higher than 11% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 48% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 77% of QLD | Higher than 51% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 82% of QLD | — |
Liveability
Avoca is more walkable (51 vs 0); Sharon scores higher overall (48 vs 42).
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 42/100 | 48/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Avoca carries more crime risk (69 vs 27).
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 69/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Avoca
- Avoca State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Sharon
- Sharon State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Childcare | 4 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 | 7 |
Mobility
Sharon sits further from the CBD (361.2 km vs 356.9 km).
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 51/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 356.9 km | 361.2 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 250 min | 253 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4670 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 4670 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (86.8%).
Setting
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 32 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 15.2 km | 17.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 67/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 36% 2,559 premises | 0% 484 premises |
Climate
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 969 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 11.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 9.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,773/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bundaberg same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hinkler | Flynn |
| Member | David Batt | Colin Boyce |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Avoca | Sharon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Avoca
Sharon
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Avoca
Other comparisons with Sharon
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.