Asquith vs Mount Colah
Asquith is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 40 in Mount Colah. In both, most households own their home and most households are couple families. In Asquith, about half of homes are flats or apartments. In Mount Colah, the large majority of homes are detached houses.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Colah
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 36/100)
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 4)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 42%)
- But Asquith has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Colah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($630,000 vs $721,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Asquith
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 18%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Asquith
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 45/100)
- has a shorter drive in (38 min vs 46 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Asquith
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (58% vs 16%)
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 45/100)
- But Mount Colah carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 36/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Asquith
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (82.5% vs 10.2%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Asquith and Mount Colah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Colah has more residents (7,816 vs 6,160); Mount Colah skews older (40 vs 36).
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,160 | 7,816 +27% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +82.5% | +10.2% |
| Median age | 36 | 40 |
| Median household income | $119,600/yr | $130,260/yr +9% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $490/wk | $525/wk +7% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,800,000 | $1,671,175 |
| Median unit price | $721,000 | $630,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 43 sales | 23 days from 67 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
13 vs 42 sales
21 vs 44 sales
6 vs 21 sales
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
15 vs 13 sales
73 vs 29 sales
11 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
Mount Colah has more land zoned for conservation (67% vs 29%).
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 29% | 67% |
| Residential | 38% | 24% |
| Parks and recreation | 17% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 10% | 6% |
| Industrial | 7% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 260 across Hornsby same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -79% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.0% $985/wk on $1.73M | 2.9% $990/wk on $1.8M |
| Units | 5.0% $690/wk on $719K | 5.4% $660/wk on $638K |
Ranking within NSW
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 51% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 95% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 35% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 20% of NSW | Higher than 16% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
Liveability
Asquith is more walkable (88 vs 45).
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Asquith carries more crime risk (36 vs 18).
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 85/100 | High 87/100 |
| Crime | Low 36/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Asquith
- Asquith Public School Government · Primary above peers
- St Patrick's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Asquith Boys High School Government · Secondary
- Asquith Girls High School Government · Secondary
Schools in Mount Colah
- Mount Colah Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Gibberagong Environmental Education Centre Government · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Childcare | 6 same for both | |
| GPs | 3 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 2 | 11 |
Mobility
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 88/100 | 45/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 31.7 km +2% vs other | 31.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 38 min | 46 min |
| Public transport score | 92/100 Rail · Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 69.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 177.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 2077 | 1.7% postcode 2079 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 17 postcode 2077 | 40 postcode 2079 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (51.4%).
Setting
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 165 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 140 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 16.3 km | 13.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 82/100 | 84/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 31% 2,764 premises | 34% 2,951 premises |
Climate
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,488/yr same for both | |
| Council | Hornsby same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Berowra same for both | |
| Member | Julian Leeser same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Asquith | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Asquith
Mount Colah
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Asquith
Other comparisons with Mount Colah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.