Aspendale Gardens vs Chelsea Heights
Chelsea Heights is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 43 in Aspendale Gardens. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Aspendale Gardens, most households are couple families. In Chelsea Heights, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Aspendale Gardens: a median of $1.24 million, against $1.01 million in Chelsea Heights, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Aspendale Gardens tends to suit couples, while Chelsea Heights suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Aspendale Gardens
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (5 vs 2)
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 56/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (77% vs 67%)
- But Chelsea Heights has more parks and reserves (8 vs 5)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Chelsea Heights
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,009,250 vs $1,240,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Chelsea Heights
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($412/wk vs $496/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Aspendale Gardens
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 56/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Aspendale Gardens and Chelsea Heights drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Aspendale Gardens rents higher ($496/wk vs $412/wk); Aspendale Gardens has higher household incomes ($114,920 vs $97,084).
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,427 +16% vs other | 5,393 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.6% | +1.1% |
| Median age | 43 | 40 |
| Median household income | $114,920/yr +16% vs other | $97,084/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $496/wk +17% vs other | $412/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,240,000 | $1,009,250 |
| Median unit price | $693,000 | $746,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 15 sales | 22 days from 22 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
30 vs 51 sales
49 vs 25 sales
9 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
Chelsea Heights has more commercially zoned land (13% vs 1%).
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 53% | 44% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 32% | 37% |
| Commercial | 1% | 13% |
| Rural and farming | 9% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 5% | 4% |
| Industrial | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 465 across Kingston (Vic.) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -36% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $850/wk on $1.09M | 4.3% $792/wk on $960K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 87% of VIC | Higher than 67% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of VIC | Higher than 90% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 32% of VIC | Higher than 39% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 91% of VIC | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 95% of VIC | Higher than 96% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 70% of VIC | Higher than 85% of VIC |
Liveability
Aspendale Gardens scores higher overall (68 vs 58).
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Chelsea Heights carries more crime risk (56 vs 26).
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 26/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | High 87/100 | High 79/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 8 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Aspendale Gardens
- Aspendale Gardens Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Chelsea Heights
- Chelsea Heights Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Childcare | 5 | 2 |
| GPs | 2 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 36.4 km | 36.8 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 43 min | 44 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 47.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 111.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 3195 | 1.1% postcode 3196 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 31 postcode 3195 | 25 postcode 3196 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.7%).
Setting
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.8 km 2.1 km to a named beach | 2.2 km 2.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 89/100 | 90/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the curb | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 45% 2,103 premises | 50% 2,428 premises |
Climate
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 644 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,940/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kingston (Vic.) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Isaacs same for both | |
| Member | Mark Dreyfus same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Aspendale Gardens | Chelsea Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Aspendale Gardens
Other comparisons with Chelsea Heights
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.