Arthurs Seat vs Rosebud
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Arthurs Seat, most households are couple families. In Rosebud, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Arthurs Seat: a median of $1.54 million, against $775,000 in Rosebud, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Arthurs Seat tends to suit couples, while Rosebud suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Arthurs Seat carries lower crime risk (59/100 vs 83/100)
- Rosebud has more parks and reserves (25 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Rosebud
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($775,000 vs $1,545,000)
- has cheaper land ($588,000 vs $830,000)
- But Arthurs Seat leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 34%)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Rosebud
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (27% vs 9%)
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $435/wk)
- But Arthurs Seat leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 30%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Rosebud
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 10/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Rosebud
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 10/100)
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (29% vs 24%)
- But Arthurs Seat carries lower crime risk (59/100 vs 83/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Arthurs Seat and Rosebud drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rosebud has more residents (14,381 vs 414); Arthurs Seat has higher household incomes ($104,780 vs $61,516).
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 414 | 14,381 +3374% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.1% | +9.0% |
| Median age | 48 | 49 |
| Median household income | $104,780/yr +41% vs other | $61,516/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $435/wk +20% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,545,000 | $775,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $617,500 |
| Median land price | $830,000 | $588,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 31 days from 5 sales | 29 days from 282 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 275 sales
5 vs 107 sales
Zoning mix
Arthurs Seat has more rural and farming land (58% vs 0%).
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 58% | 0% |
| Residential | 8% | 55% |
| Parks and recreation | 30% | 16% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 14% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 9% |
| Industrial | 0% | 4% |
| Commercial | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 791 across Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $600/wk on $825K |
| Units | — | 4.4% $595/wk on $700K |
Ranking within VIC
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 51% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 77% of VIC | Higher than 22% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 66% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 71% of VIC | Higher than 89% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 21% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 75% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 81% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 53% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 27% of VIC |
Liveability
Rosebud is more walkable (65 vs 10).
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 55/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Arthurs Seat carries more bushfire risk (73 vs 0); Rosebud carries more flood risk (24 vs 0).
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 73/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 59/100 | High 83/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 6 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Arthurs Seat
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Rosebud
- Rosebud Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Rosebud Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Our Lady of Fatima School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Oakwood School-Rosebud Campus Government · Secondary
- Padua College - Rosebud Campus Catholic · Secondary
- Advance College of Education Incorporated Independent · Secondary · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 25 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 25 |
| Childcare | 0 | 9 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 5 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 6 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 5 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Beaches | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 10 | 5 |
Mobility
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 65/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 89.4 km | 91.2 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 74 min | 72 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3936 | 1.0% postcode 3939 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 25 postcode 3936 | 31 postcode 3939 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.7%).
Setting
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 253 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 37 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.8 km 3.2 km to a named beach | 2.4 km 2.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 64/100 | 73/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 271 premises | 50% 10,138 premises |
Climate
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 700 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,659/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flinders same for both | |
| Member | Zoe Mckenzie same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Arthurs Seat | Rosebud | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Rosebud
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Arthurs Seat
Other comparisons with Rosebud
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.