Arthurs Seat vs Red Hill
Comparing Arthurs Seat and Red Hill, VIC: Arthurs Seat carries more bushfire risk (73 vs 0); Red Hill is more walkable (26 vs 10); and Red Hill has more residents (1,009 vs 414).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Red Hill
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Arthurs Seat
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($830,000 vs $2,537,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Red Hill
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (26/100 vs 10/100)
- has a shorter drive in (68 min vs 74 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (84.8 km vs 89.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Red Hill
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (26/100 vs 10/100)
- carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Arthurs Seat and Red Hill drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Red Hill has more residents (1,009 vs 414); Red Hill has higher household incomes ($121,888 vs $104,780).
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 414 | 1,009 +144% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.1% | +9.2% |
| Median age | 48 | 50 |
| Median household income | $104,780/yr | $121,888/yr +16% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $435/wk | $461/wk +6% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,545,000 | $1,610,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $830,000 | $2,537,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 31 days from 5 sales | 146 days from 6 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 7 sales
5 vs 12 sales
Zoning mix
Red Hill has more rural and farming land (92% vs 58%).
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 58% | 92% |
| Parks and recreation | 30% | 4% |
| Residential | 8% | 1% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 791 across Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 86% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 77% of VIC | Higher than 92% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 71% of VIC | Higher than 82% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 29% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 100% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 75% of VIC |
Liveability
Red Hill is more walkable (26 vs 10).
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | A |
| Score | — | 75/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Arthurs Seat carries more bushfire risk (73 vs 0); Arthurs Seat carries more crime risk (59 vs 34).
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 73/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 59/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Arthurs Seat
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Red Hill
- Red Hill Consolidated School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Childcare | 0 | 3 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 10 | 17 |
Mobility
Arthurs Seat sits further from the CBD (89.4 km vs 84.8 km).
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 26/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 89.4 km +5% vs other | 84.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 74 min | 68 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3936 | 3.4% postcode 3937 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 25 postcode 3936 | 52 postcode 3937 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (57.3%).
Setting
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 253 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 177 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.8 km 3.2 km to a named beach | 5.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 64/100 | 60/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 271 premises | 35% 598 premises |
Climate
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 700 mm | 696 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 24.5°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 6.5°C |
Council rates
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,659/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flinders same for both | |
| Member | Zoe Mckenzie same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Arthurs Seat | Red Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Arthurs Seat
Other comparisons with Red Hill
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.