Aramac vs Jericho
Jericho is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 41 in Aramac. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Jericho tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Jericho
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 74/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Jericho
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (820 min vs 919 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (1117.1 km vs 1201.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Jericho
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 74/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 16%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Aramac and Jericho drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Aramac has more residents (372 vs 229); Aramac skews older (41 vs 38).
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372 +38% vs other | 229 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — same for both | |
| Median age | 41 | 38 |
| Median household income | $68,640/yr +2% vs other | $67,184/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $94/wk | $100/wk +6% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6 across Barcaldine same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 35% of QLD | Higher than 33% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 38% of QLD | Higher than 1% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 13% of QLD | Higher than 1% of QLD |
Liveability
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Jericho carries more bushfire risk (42 vs 0); Aramac carries more crime risk (74 vs 31).
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Crime | High 74/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Aramac
- Aramac State School Government · Combined below peers
Schools in Jericho
- Jericho State School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 5 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| GPs | 2 | 1 |
| Police stations | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 891 | 231 |
Mobility
Aramac sits further from the CBD (1201.5 km vs 1117.1 km).
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1201.5 km +7% vs other | 1117.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 919 min | 820 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 4726 | 0.0% postcode 4728 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 36 postcode 4726 | 48 postcode 4728 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (52.5%).
Setting
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 267 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 376 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 81 premises | 0% 60 premises |
Federal electorate
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maranoa same for both | |
| Member | David Littleproud same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Aramac | Jericho | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Jericho
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Aramac
Other comparisons with Jericho
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.