Appin vs Gilead
Appin is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 74 in Gilead. In both, the large majority of households own their home. In Appin, the large majority of homes are detached houses and most households are couple families. In Gilead, the large majority of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Appin: a median of $1.06 million, against $886,000 in Gilead, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Appin tends to suit couples, while Gilead suits people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Appin
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 4%)
- is already more of a family suburb (82% vs 11%)
- has more childcare (5 vs 0)
- But Gilead carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Gilead
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 24%)
- has cheaper houses ($885,745 vs $1,056,000)
- But Appin has cheaper land ($596,000 vs $700,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Appin
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (17% vs 6%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 35%)
- But Gilead has cheaper rent ($265/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Gilead
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (66 min vs 94 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (67.7 km vs 81.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Gilead
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (98% vs 4%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (87% vs 10%)
- carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 68/100)
- But Appin has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Gilead
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (111.5% vs 22.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Appin and Gilead drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Appin has more residents (3,213 vs 882); Appin has higher household incomes ($125,996 vs $39,416).
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,213 +73% vs other | 882 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +22.0% | +111.5% |
| Median age | 33 | 74 |
| Median household income | $125,996/yr +69% vs other | $39,416/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk +41% vs other | $265/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (40.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,056,000 | $885,745 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $596,000 | $700,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 33 days from 51 sales | 60 days from 22 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
76 vs 44 sales
22 vs 13 sales
Zoning mix
Appin has more land zoned for conservation (69% vs 14%); Gilead has more rural and farming land (54% vs 17%).
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 69% | 14% |
| Rural and farming | 17% | 54% |
| Residential | 10% | 13% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 12% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 4% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,338 across Wollondilly | 1,788 across Campbelltown (NSW) |
| Approvals change year on year | +92% | +48% |
Gross rental yield
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $780/wk on $1.2M | 3.4% $840/wk on $1.28M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 23% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 87% of NSW | Higher than 4% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 31% of NSW | Higher than 46% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 27% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 74% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 64% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 39% of NSW |
Liveability
Appin scores higher overall (29 vs 24).
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D same for both | |
| Score | 29/100 | 24/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Appin carries more crime risk (68 vs 34).
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 83/100 | High 84/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 68/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 Western Sydney University - Campbelltown, 8.4 km |
Schools in Appin
- Appin Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Gilead
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 2 |
| Childcare | 5 | 0 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 19 | 21 |
Mobility
Appin sits further from the CBD (81.2 km vs 67.7 km).
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 81.2 km +17% vs other | 67.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 94 min | 66 min |
| Public transport score | 67/100 Bus | 27/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 23.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 3.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 12 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 2560 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 44 postcode 2560 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.1%).
Setting
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 275 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 182 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 15.6 km | 21.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 39/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 58% 1,163 premises | 8% 38 premises |
Climate
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.97 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,099/yr | $1,443/yr |
| Council | Wollondilly | Campbelltown (NSW) |
Federal electorate
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hume | Macarthur |
| Member | Angus Taylor | Mike Freelander |
| Party | Liberal | Australian Labor Party |
First Home Owner Grant
| Appin | Gilead | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Appin
Gilead
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Appin
Other comparisons with Gilead
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.