Anambah vs Rutherford
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Anambah, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Anambah: a median of $848,000, against $755,000 in Rutherford, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Anambah tends to suit couples, while Rutherford suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Rutherford
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (10 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
- But Anambah is already more of a family suburb (75% vs 60%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Anambah leaves households under less mortgage stress (16% vs 27%)
- Rutherford has cheaper houses ($755,000 vs $848,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Rutherford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 14%)
- has cheaper rent ($360/wk vs $525/wk)
- But Anambah leaves renters under less rental stress (17% vs 24%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Rutherford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (28/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (171.6 km vs 174.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Rutherford
ahead on 4 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (28/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (18% vs 11%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Anambah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (113.3% vs 10.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Anambah and Rutherford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rutherford has more residents (13,091 vs 64); Anambah has higher household incomes ($158,548 vs $76,700).
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 64 | 13,091 +20355% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +113.3% | +10.2% |
| Median age | 37 | 35 |
| Median household income | $158,548/yr +52% vs other | $76,700/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $525/wk +31% vs other | $360/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.6%).
Property market
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $848,000 | $755,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $565,000 |
| Median land price | — | $835,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 49 days from 6 sales | 23 days from 192 sales |
Zoning mix
Anambah has more rural and farming land (59% vs 1%); Rutherford has more industrially zoned land (31% vs 0%).
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 59% | 1% |
| Residential | 26% | 38% |
| Industrial | 0% | 31% |
| Environmental | 13% | 8% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 13% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 10% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,413 across Maitland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +20% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.2% $655/wk on $808K |
| Units | — | 4.2% $500/wk on $625K |
Ranking within NSW
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 29% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 96% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 34% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 56% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 83% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 29% of NSW |
Liveability
Rutherford is more walkable (28 vs 0).
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 28/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Anambah carries more crime risk (96 vs 86).
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 96/100 | High 86/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Anambah
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Rutherford
- Rutherford Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Rutherford Technology High School Government · Secondary at peers
- St Paul's Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Childcare | 0 | 10 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 8 |
| Waterways | 0 | 9 |
Mobility
Anambah sits further from the CBD (174.2 km vs 171.6 km).
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 28/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 174.2 km +1% vs other | 171.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 133 min | 132 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2320 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 2320 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.4%).
Setting
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 31.4 km | 28.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 88/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 83% 156 premises | 53% 6,279 premises |
Climate
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 996 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,908/yr same for both | |
| Council | Maitland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Paterson same for both | |
| Member | Meryl Swanson same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Anambah | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Anambah
Rutherford
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Anambah
Other comparisons with Rutherford
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.