Allgomera vs Tamban
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Allgomera, about half of households are couple families. In Tamban, most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Allgomera: a median of $878,000, against $700,000 in Tamban, though rent is higher in Tamban. On these figures, Allgomera tends to suit couples and older residents, while Tamban suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Allgomera is already more of a family suburb (63% vs 42%)
- Tamban carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 61/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Tamban
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (26% vs 37%)
- has cheaper houses ($700,000 vs $878,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Allgomera
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (14% vs 28%)
- has cheaper rent ($130/wk vs $270/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Allgomera has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 18%)
- Tamban carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 61/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Allgomera and Tamban drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Tamban rents higher ($270/wk vs $130/wk); Allgomera has more residents (139 vs 94).
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139 +32% vs other | 94 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.1% | +2.2% |
| Median age | 53 | 55 |
| Median household income | $49,348/yr same for both | |
| Median weekly rent | $130/wk | $270/wk +108% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (34.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.7%).
Property market
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $878,000 | $700,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Tamban has more rural and farming land (67% vs 53%); Allgomera has more land zoned for conservation (46% vs 33%).
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 53% | 67% |
| Environmental | 46% | 33% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Nambucca Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -64% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 41% of NSW | Higher than 26% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 11% of NSW | Higher than 10% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 42% of NSW | Higher than 17% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 35% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 39% of NSW |
Liveability
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Allgomera carries more bushfire risk (85 vs 55); Allgomera carries more crime risk (61 vs 42).
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 85/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 61/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 10 | 4 |
Mobility
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 468.1 km same for both | |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 325 min | 329 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2441 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 72 postcode 2441 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.7%).
Setting
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 56 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 66 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 19.6 km | 18.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 27/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 56 premises | 0% 44 premises |
Council rates
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,175/yr same for both | |
| Council | Nambucca Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Allgomera | Tamban | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Allgomera
Other comparisons with Tamban
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.