Allenview vs Cedar Grove
Cedar Grove is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 47 in Allenview. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Cedar Grove tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Cedar Grove
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 3)
- carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Allenview has a bigger rental market to choose from (19% vs 8%)
- Cedar Grove has cheaper rent ($430/wk vs $465/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Cedar Grove
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (24/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (51 min vs 66 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (55.8 km vs 70.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Cedar Grove
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (24/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 62/100)
- But Allenview has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 13%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Allenview
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (13.6% vs -2.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Allenview and Cedar Grove drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Cedar Grove has more residents (1,992 vs 209); Allenview skews older (47 vs 38).
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 209 | 1,992 +853% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +13.6% | -2.4% |
| Median age | 47 | 38 |
| Median household income | $97,500/yr | $105,664/yr +8% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $465/wk +8% vs other | $430/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,057,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,205,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 34 days from 13 sales |
Development activity
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim | 4,950 across Logan |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% | -8% |
Gross rental yield
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.1% $1,000/wk on $1.27M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 71% of QLD | Higher than 78% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 9% of QLD | Higher than 80% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 60% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 50% of QLD | Higher than 72% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 60% of QLD |
Liveability
Cedar Grove is more walkable (24 vs 0).
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 63/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Allenview carries more crime risk (62 vs 32).
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 62/100 | Low 32/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 6 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 4 |
Mobility
Allenview sits further from the CBD (70.2 km vs 55.8 km).
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 24/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 70.2 km +21% vs other | 55.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 66 min | 51 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4285 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 84 postcode 4285 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.7%).
Setting
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 61 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 44 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 44.0 km | 35.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 58/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 70 premises | 27% 708 premises |
Climate
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,682 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 13.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr | $1,681/yr |
| Council | Scenic Rim | Logan |
Federal electorate
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Allenview | Cedar Grove | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Allenview
Other comparisons with Cedar Grove
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.