Acton Park vs Sabina River
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Acton Park, most households are people living alone. In Sabina River, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Acton Park tends to suit people living alone, while Sabina River suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sabina River
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 22/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (80% vs 44%)
- But Acton Park has more separate houses rather than flats (91% vs 67%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Sabina River
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (43% vs 13%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Sabina River
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (149 min vs 156 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (226.8 km vs 234 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Sabina River
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (33% vs 9%)
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 22/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Sabina River
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.9% vs -9.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Acton Park and Sabina River drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sabina River skews older (44 vs 42).
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92 +14% vs other | 79 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -9.8% | +3.9% |
| Median age | 42 | 44 |
| Median household income | $74,724/yr +4% vs other | $71,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $150/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 440 across Busselton same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 37% of WA | Higher than 31% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 42% of WA | Higher than 15% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 44% of WA | Higher than 43% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 57% of WA | Higher than 56% of WA |
Liveability
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Sabina River carries more bushfire risk (34 vs 13); Acton Park carries more crime risk (22 vs 11).
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 13/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Crime | Low 22/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Acton Park sits further from the CBD (234 km vs 226.8 km).
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Perth | 234 km +3% vs other | 226.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 156 min | 149 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 6280 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 58 postcode 6280 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.2%).
Setting
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 38 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 45 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 13.2 km | 13.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 45 premises | 0% 35 premises |
Climate
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 624 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,028/yr same for both | |
| Council | Busselton same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forrest same for both | |
| Member | Ben Small same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Acton Park | Sabina River | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Acton Park
Other comparisons with Sabina River
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.