Acacia Hills vs Lloyd Creek
Lloyd Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 40 in Acacia Hills. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Lloyd Creek tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lloyd Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 68%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Acacia Hills has cheaper rent ($390/wk vs $470/wk)
- Lloyd Creek has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 10%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lloyd Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (61.1 km vs 63.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Lloyd Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (36.4% vs 2.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Acacia Hills and Lloyd Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Acacia Hills has more residents (711 vs 225); Acacia Hills skews older (40 vs 33).
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 711 +68% vs other | 225 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.4% | +36.4% |
| Median age | 40 | 33 |
| Median household income | $123,760/yr | $147,316/yr +19% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $390/wk | $470/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $715,000 | $670,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $860,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 40 days from 6 sales | 46 days from 3 sales |
Development activity
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 130 across Litchfield same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Ranking within NT
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 84% of NT | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 5% of NT | Higher than 49% of NT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 7% of NT | Higher than 44% of NT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 59% of NT | Higher than 66% of NT |
Liveability
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 37/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Acacia Hills sits further from the CBD (63.4 km vs 61.1 km).
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Darwin | 63.4 km +4% vs other | 61.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 51 min | 54 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 0822 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 26 postcode 0822 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.8%).
Setting
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 76 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 23.1 km | 20.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 22/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 234 premises | 0% 67 premises |
Climate
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,541 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,153/yr same for both | |
| Council | Litchfield same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lingiari same for both | |
| Member | Marion Scrymgour same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Acacia Hills | Lloyd Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $50,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Acacia Hills
Lloyd Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Acacia Hills
Other comparisons with Lloyd Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.