Greenest suburbs in Perth

Crawley tops the ranking with about 388 hectares of parkland within a kilometre of the suburb centre, across 12 separate parks. The 15 listed run from about 388 hectares down to 112. Parkland means public parks, gardens and reserves mapped in OpenStreetMap, measured as area rather than as a count of parks. It is not a measure of tree cover, so a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here. These 15 suburbs came from a field of 246 eligible Perth suburbs.

This ranking scores every eligible Perth suburb on the total area of parks, gardens and nature reserves within a kilometre of the suburb centre, with the number of separate parks as a tiebreaker. It measures parkland you could walk to, not tree cover — a street of large private gardens is leafy without being green by this measure.

Area is the right unit here and a count of parks is not: counting features rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same. Measured in August 2026, Canberra held 394 mapped park features within 25 km of its centre against Sydney's 3,388, but 95.4 km2 of park area against Sydney's 71.9 — the average Canberra park is over eleven times the size. A ranking built on counts would have named the bush capital the least green city in the country. Each park counts for at most the area of the walking circle itself, so a single large reserve on the edge of the ring cannot decide the list. Park boundaries come from OpenStreetMap, so a park nobody has mapped is one this ranking cannot see.

Perth suburbs with the most parkland nearby

Ranked on how much park and reserve area sits within a kilometre of the suburb centre. The number of separate parks is shown and breaks ties. Area, not a count of parks: counting features rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same.

1

Crawley

WA 6009 · 3,975 residents

388 ha of parkland within 1 km · 12 separate parks · largest 314 ha

B 100.0
2

Salter Point

WA 6152 · 2,913 residents

322 ha of parkland within 1 km · 7 separate parks · largest 314 ha

A 99.6
3

Wilson

WA 6107 · 6,608 residents

316 ha of parkland within 1 km · 13 separate parks · largest 287 ha

C 99.2
4

Ferndale

WA 6148 · 4,457 residents

306 ha of parkland within 1 km · 8 separate parks · largest 287 ha

C 98.8
5

Coogee

WA 6166 · 5,345 residents

279 ha of parkland within 1 km · 4 separate parks · largest 262 ha

B 98.4
6

Forrestdale

WA 6112 · 1,027 residents

255 ha of parkland within 1 km · 2 separate parks · largest 246 ha

C 98.0
7

Stratton

WA 6056 · 3,267 residents

182 ha of parkland within 1 km · 4 separate parks · largest 95 ha

C 97.5
8

Wattle Grove

WA 6107 · 6,547 residents

167 ha of parkland within 1 km · 3 separate parks · largest 165 ha

B 97.1
9

Koondoola

WA 6064 · 3,919 residents

156 ha of parkland within 1 km · 7 separate parks · largest 137 ha

C 96.7
10

North Coogee

WA 6163 · 3,741 residents

133 ha of parkland within 1 km · 10 separate parks · largest 130 ha

A 96.3
11

Guildford

WA 6055 · 2,040 residents

125 ha of parkland within 1 km · 7 separate parks · largest 69 ha

B 95.9
12

North Beach

WA 6020 · 3,689 residents

123 ha of parkland within 1 km · 4 separate parks · largest 102 ha

A 95.5
13

Harrisdale

WA 6112 · 11,667 residents

121 ha of parkland within 1 km · 13 separate parks · largest 98 ha

A 95.1
14

Banjup

WA 6164 · 1,377 residents

120 ha of parkland within 1 km · 1 separate park · largest 120 ha

B 94.7
15

Wembley

WA 6014 · 12,061 residents

112 ha of parkland within 1 km · 4 separate parks · largest 110 ha

A 94.3

Ranked from 246 qualifying suburbs.

How we ranked these

Ranked entirely on the total area of parks, gardens and reserves within 1000 m of the suburb centre, percentile-ranked within Perth's candidate pool. The number of separate parks is shown on every row and breaks ties, but does not otherwise move the order: percentile ranks record position rather than size, so a suburb with three times the parkland gains only a point or two, and a second weighted factor would decide the list while appearing to be a minor one. Area rather than a count of parks, because counting features rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same: measured in August 2026, Canberra held 394 mapped park features within 25 km of its centre against Sydney's 3,388, but 95.4 km² of park area against Sydney's 71.9. Each park counts for at most 3.14 km², the area of the circle itself, so one large reserve on the edge of the ring cannot decide the ranking. This measures public parkland you could walk to, not tree cover — a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here — and boundaries come from OpenStreetMap, so an unmapped park is invisible to it. See how we calculate for the full methodology.

Common questions about this ranking

What are the greenest suburbs in Perth?

Crawley tops the ranking with about 388 hectares of parkland within a kilometre of the suburb centre, across 12 separate parks. The 15 listed run from about 388 hectares down to 112. Parkland means public parks, gardens and reserves mapped in OpenStreetMap, measured as area rather than as a count of parks. It is not a measure of tree cover, so a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here. These 15 suburbs came from a field of 246 eligible Perth suburbs.

What makes a Perth suburb 'greenest' here?

The total area of parks, gardens and nature reserves whose centre sits within 1,000 m of the centre of the suburb. It is a measure of parkland you could walk to, not of tree cover: a leafy street of large private gardens has no parkland in it and does not score.

Why rank on park area instead of the number of parks?

Because counting parks rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same. Measured across Australia in August 2026, Canberra had 394 park features within 25 km of its centre against Sydney's 3,388 — but 95.4 km2 of park area against Sydney's 71.9. Ranking on counts would have called the bush capital the least green city in the country.

Does the number of parks matter at all?

It is shown on every row and breaks ties, but it does not otherwise change the order. A weighted version was tried and dropped: scores are percentile ranks, which record position rather than size, so a suburb with three times the parkland of another gains only a point or two — and a factor meant to be minor ended up deciding the list.

How is a very large national park handled?

Each park counts for at most 3.14 km2, which is the area of the 1,000 m circle itself. A reserve larger than everything within walking distance of you cannot give you more green space than that area holds, and without the limit a single large reserve on the edge of the ring would decide the whole ranking.

Why isn't a suburb I know to be leafy on the Perth list?

Most likely it has private gardens and street trees rather than public parkland, or its parks sit past the ring measured from the suburb centre. Park boundaries come from OpenStreetMap, so a park that has not been mapped is a park this ranking cannot see.

Same list in other cities

Related

Rankings last computed 28 September 2026. Recomputed after each ACARA schools data refresh.

Was the information on this page useful to you?

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or