Best Launceston suburbs for public transport

The suburb of Launceston tops the ranking, with 202 scheduled peak-hour arrivals an hour. Kings Meadows and South Launceston round out the top three. These 15 suburbs came from a field of 23 eligible Launceston suburbs.

This ranking scores every eligible Launceston suburb on public-transport quality — a composite of peak and off-peak arrivals, median headway, span of service, mode weighting (rail > tram > bus), and peak-hour direct-CBD access. Walkability, safety, and CBD distance are blended in as tie-breakers.

The transport-quality score is derived from each state's GTFS timetable feed. We sample a representative weekday and Saturday and count arrivals at every stop inside the suburb, then weight the mode mix (a train station outranks a bus stop at the same headway) and layer in the peak headway of any trip that terminates in the Launceston CBD. Percentile ranks are computed within Launceston's candidate pool, so a suburb's transit ranking is relative to other Launceston suburbs — a Sydney "top 5%" and a Perth "top 5%" both hit rank 1 of their own city's pool.

Launceston suburbs with the best public transport

Ranked on the GTFS-derived transport-quality score — peak / off-peak / weekend arrivals, median headway, span of service, mode weight (rail > tram > bus), and peak-hour direct-CBD headway. Blended with walkability, safety, and CBD access as secondary factors.

1

Launceston

TAS 7250 · 3,110 residents

92.8/100 transport · 202.0 arrivals/hr peak · 0-min headway

B 92.7
2

Kings Meadows

TAS 7249 · 4,359 residents

92.3/100 transport · 62.0 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

B 90.3
3

South Launceston

TAS 7249 · 4,894 residents

92.2/100 transport · 108.5 arrivals/hr peak · 0-min headway

A 85.6
4

Youngtown

TAS 7249 · 4,315 residents

77.5/100 transport · 62.8 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

B 75.8
5

Invermay

TAS 7248 · 3,498 residents

92.1/100 transport · 68.5 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

B 74.3
6

Newnham

TAS 7248 · 7,073 residents

92.1/100 transport · 80.5 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

C 71.8
7

Newstead

TAS 7250 · 5,617 residents

76.6/100 transport · 52.5 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

A+ 69.2
8

Mowbray

TAS 7248 · 4,048 residents

92.2/100 transport · 41.5 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

D 67.1
9

Prospect Vale

TAS 7250 · 5,433 residents

76.8/100 transport · 85.0 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

A 66.6
10

Norwood

TAS 7250 · 3,869 residents

76.5/100 transport · 29.8 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

A 66.0
11

Prospect

TAS 7250 · 1,908 residents

76.9/100 transport · 40.0 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

A 59.5
12

East Launceston

TAS 7250 · 2,270 residents

68.4/100 transport · 26.8 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

A+ 55.0
13

Ravenswood

TAS 7250 · 3,804 residents

76.1/100 transport · 36.5 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

C 50.2
14

West Launceston

TAS 7250 · 4,316 residents

65.6/100 transport · 23.0 arrivals/hr peak · 1-min headway

A 41.0
15

Trevallyn

TAS 7250 · 4,826 residents

75.6/100 transport · 72.2 arrivals/hr peak · 0.5-min headway

B 40.9

Ranked from 23 qualifying suburbs.

How we ranked these

60% transport-quality composite (peak / off-peak / weekend arrivals, median headway, span of service, mode weight, and direct-CBD headway) · 15% walkability · 15% safety (bushfire, crime, flood risks combined) · 10% CBD access. Percentile ranks are computed within Launceston's candidate pool. Suburbs below the ingest arrivals-per-week floor are excluded rather than ranked at zero. See how we calculate for the full methodology.

Common questions about this ranking

What are the best Launceston suburbs for public transport?

The suburb of Launceston tops the ranking, with 202 scheduled peak-hour arrivals an hour. Kings Meadows and South Launceston round out the top three. These 15 suburbs came from a field of 23 eligible Launceston suburbs.

How is this ranking scored?

Each eligible Launceston suburb is scored on a composite transport-quality signal blended with walkability, safety, and CBD access. The transport-quality signal itself blends peak-hour (7-9am + 5-7pm) and off-peak weekday arrivals, Saturday service, median headway, span-of-service, mode weighting (rail > tram > bus), and peak-hour direct-CBD headway. The composite carries the heaviest weight in the final score (60%); percentile ranks are computed within Launceston's candidate pool, not nationally.

Where does the timetable data come from?

Every state government publishes a GTFS (General Transit Feed Specification) timetable feed covering all scheduled buses, trains, trams, and ferries in the state. We ingest these feeds and aggregate arrivals across every stop inside each suburb boundary on a representative Wednesday and Saturday. Nothing paid, nothing scraped — it's the same data that powers the transit-planner apps.

Does this measure reliability or on-time performance?

No — scheduled service only. GTFS-realtime feeds carry delays and cancellations but they're per-agency, per-day, and not part of this ingest. A suburb whose bus network runs 20 minutes late every peak still scores here on the timetable. Reliability data is a candidate for a future layer.

How often is this list updated?

The top 15 is recomputed whenever we re-run the GTFS aggregation pipeline. Feeds themselves refresh weekly to monthly per agency; big service changes (a new metro line, a route reshuffle) land in the next re-computation.

Same list in other cities

Related

Rankings last computed 28 September 2026. Recomputed after each ACARA schools data refresh.

Was the information on this page useful to you?

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or