Sportiest Launceston suburbs
Newstead tops the ranking. Parkland means public parks, gardens and reserves mapped in OpenStreetMap, measured as area rather than as a count of parks. It is not a measure of tree cover, so a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here.
This ranking counts the public sport and recreation facilities within 3 km of each Launceston suburb centre -- the aquatic and leisure centres, golf courses and stadiums a resident actually travels to.
Facilities come from OpenStreetMap and only NAMED ones are counted, which is what separates a public pool from the 40,681 private backyard pools mapped across Australia. TENNIS COURTS AND OVALS ARE DELIBERATELY EXCLUDED. Only 7.2% of them carry a name in OpenStreetMap against 83.6% of leisure centres, so counting courts would rank which councils label their courts rather than which suburbs have somewhere to play -- measured, the top fifteen by named court count and by true court count share one suburb in Melbourne and none in Adelaide. The number of DIFFERENT facility types nearby is shown on every row but does not change the order, because a tie-break that can take only five values would quietly become the ranking. COMMERCIAL GYMS ARE NOT COUNTED. A gym chain opens where the foot traffic is, so counting them ranks office and apartment density rather than sport: measured, the top suburb's 106 facilities were 71 gyms. They still appear on suburb and property pages, where a gym 400 m away is worth knowing. Counting anything within a radius still favours dense inner suburbs, which is a fact about where facilities are rather than a claim that outer suburbs are poorly served. This counts what is mapped and named nearby, not every facility that exists, and it says nothing about whether any of them is any good.
Sportiest Launceston suburbs
Ranked by the number of public sport and recreation facilities a resident travels to -- aquatic and leisure centres, golf courses and stadiums -- within 3 km of the suburb centre, from OpenStreetMap. Commercial gyms are NOT counted: they open where the foot traffic is, so counting them ranks office and apartment density. Counting facilities within a radius favours dense inner suburbs either way, which is a fact about where facilities are, not a claim that anywhere else is poorly served. Tennis courts and ovals are deliberately NOT counted: only 7.2% of them carry a name in OpenStreetMap, so counting them would rank which councils label their courts rather than which suburbs have facilities.
Newstead
TAS 7250 · 5,617 residents17 facilities within 3 km · 3 kinds
Invermay
TAS 7248 · 3,498 residents15 facilities within 3 km · 3 kinds
East Launceston
TAS 7250 · 2,270 residents15 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Launceston
TAS 7250 · 3,110 residents15 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
South Launceston
TAS 7249 · 4,894 residents13 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Norwood
TAS 7250 · 3,869 residents10 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Mowbray
TAS 7248 · 4,048 residents8 facilities within 3 km · 3 kinds
West Launceston
TAS 7250 · 4,316 residents7 facilities within 3 km
Newnham
TAS 7248 · 7,073 residents6 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Kings Meadows
TAS 7249 · 4,359 residents5 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Summerhill
TAS 7250 · 3,139 residents5 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Ravenswood
TAS 7250 · 3,804 residents4 facilities within 3 km
Trevallyn
TAS 7250 · 4,826 residents4 facilities within 3 km
Prospect Vale
TAS 7250 · 5,433 residents3 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Youngtown
TAS 7249 · 4,315 residents3 facilities within 3 km · 2 kinds
Ranked from 15 qualifying suburbs.
The number of public sport and recreation facilities within 3 km of the suburb centre — aquatic and leisure centres, gyms, golf courses and stadiums — percentile-ranked within Launceston's candidate pool. Facilities come from OpenStreetMap and only NAMED ones count, which is what separates a public pool from the 40,681 private backyard pools mapped nationally. TENNIS COURTS AND OVALS ARE EXCLUDED: only 7.2% carry a name against 83.6% of leisure centres, so counting them would rank which councils label their courts. The number of different facility types is shown on each row and breaks ties only — it takes just five values, so letting it score would make the tie-break the ranking. A suburb with no facility within the ring is left out rather than ranked last. This counts what is mapped and named, not every facility that exists, and says nothing about whether any is any good. See how we calculate for the full methodology.
Common questions about this ranking
What are the sportiest Launceston suburbs?
Newstead tops the ranking. Parkland means public parks, gardens and reserves mapped in OpenStreetMap, measured as area rather than as a count of parks. It is not a measure of tree cover, so a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here.
How is this ranking put together?
Each Launceston suburb is ranked by how many public sport and recreation facilities sit within 3 km of its centre -- aquatic and leisure centres, gyms, golf courses and stadiums. Facilities come from OpenStreetMap. Only suburbs with at least 2,000 residents are ranked, and a suburb with none nearby is left out rather than ranked last.
Why are tennis courts and ovals not counted?
Because counting them would measure map-keeping, not facilities. Only 7.2% of courts and ovals carry a name in OpenStreetMap, against 83.6% of leisure centres, and unnamed ones cannot be told apart from each other. Ranking on them produces a different list entirely -- the top fifteen by named court count and by true court count share one suburb in Melbourne and none in Adelaide.
Does a high ranking mean the facilities are good?
No. This counts facilities near a suburb; it says nothing about their condition, cost, opening hours or whether they take new members. It also counts what is mapped and named in OpenStreetMap, which is not a complete register of every facility in Australia.
Why a 3 km radius?
Because an aquatic centre is somewhere a family drives to, not somewhere they walk. The parks ranking uses a 1 km ring for the opposite reason. A facility three suburbs away still counts here, so neighbouring suburbs will often share much of the same list.
Same list in other cities
- Sportiest Sydney suburbs
- Sportiest Melbourne suburbs
- Sportiest Brisbane suburbs
- Sportiest Perth suburbs
- Sportiest Adelaide suburbs
- Sportiest Hobart suburbs
- Sportiest Darwin suburbs
- Sportiest Canberra suburbs
- Sportiest Newcastle suburbs
- Sportiest Central Coast suburbs
- Sportiest Sunshine Coast suburbs
- Sportiest Gold Coast suburbs
- Sportiest Wollongong suburbs
- Sportiest Geelong suburbs
- Sportiest Townsville suburbs
- Sportiest Toowoomba suburbs
- Sportiest Busselton suburbs
- Sportiest Ballarat suburbs
- Sportiest Cairns suburbs
- Sportiest Albany suburbs
- Sportiest Ballina suburbs
- Sportiest Geraldton suburbs
- Sportiest Warragul suburbs
- Sportiest Bundaberg suburbs
- Sportiest Bendigo suburbs
- Sportiest Rockhampton suburbs
- Sportiest Mackay suburbs
- Sportiest Albury – Wodonga suburbs
- Sportiest Camden Haven suburbs
- Sportiest Burnie suburbs
- Sportiest Wagga Wagga suburbs
- Sportiest Coffs Harbour suburbs
- Sportiest Alice Springs suburbs
- Sportiest Mount Isa suburbs
Related
Rankings last computed 28 September 2026. Recomputed after each ACARA schools data refresh.
Was the information on this page useful to you?
Thanks! Anything we could improve?
We hate spam as much as you do — we'll never use your email for marketing, and we might not be able to reply to everyone.
Thanks for your feedback! 🙏