Greenest suburbs in Canberra

Casey tops the ranking with about 458 hectares of parkland within a kilometre of the suburb centre, across 6 separate parks. The 15 listed run from about 458 hectares down to 79. Parkland means public parks, gardens and reserves mapped in OpenStreetMap, measured as area rather than as a count of parks. It is not a measure of tree cover, so a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here. These 15 suburbs came from a field of 91 eligible Canberra suburbs.

This ranking scores every eligible Canberra suburb on the total area of parks, gardens and nature reserves within a kilometre of the suburb centre, with the number of separate parks as a tiebreaker. It measures parkland you could walk to, not tree cover — a street of large private gardens is leafy without being green by this measure.

Area is the right unit here and a count of parks is not: counting features rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same. Measured in August 2026, Canberra held 394 mapped park features within 25 km of its centre against Sydney's 3,388, but 95.4 km2 of park area against Sydney's 71.9 — the average Canberra park is over eleven times the size. A ranking built on counts would have named the bush capital the least green city in the country. Each park counts for at most the area of the walking circle itself, so a single large reserve on the edge of the ring cannot decide the list. Park boundaries come from OpenStreetMap, so a park nobody has mapped is one this ranking cannot see.

Canberra suburbs with the most parkland nearby

Ranked on how much park and reserve area sits within a kilometre of the suburb centre. The number of separate parks is shown and breaks ties. Area, not a count of parks: counting features rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same.

1

Casey

ACT 2913 · 6,471 residents

458 ha of parkland within 1 km · 6 separate parks · largest 228 ha

B 100.0
2

Bonython

ACT 2905 · 3,839 residents

318 ha of parkland within 1 km · 2 separate parks · largest 314 ha

D 98.9
3

Conder

ACT 2906 · 5,108 residents

314 ha of parkland within 1 km · 1 separate park · largest 314 ha

D 96.7
4

Theodore

ACT 2905 · 3,798 residents

314 ha of parkland within 1 km · 1 separate park · largest 314 ha

D 96.7
5

Isaacs

ACT 2607 · 2,379 residents

314 ha of parkland within 1 km · 1 separate park · largest 314 ha

C 96.7
6

Red Hill

ACT 2603 · 3,146 residents

294 ha of parkland within 1 km · 2 separate parks · largest 292 ha

B 94.4
7

Fadden

ACT 2904 · 3,006 residents

262 ha of parkland within 1 km · 1 separate park · largest 262 ha

C 93.3
8

Chapman

ACT 2611 · 2,867 residents

199 ha of parkland within 1 km · 5 separate parks · largest 188 ha

B 92.2
9

Farrer

ACT 2607 · 3,787 residents

185 ha of parkland within 1 km · 2 separate parks · largest 185 ha

B 91.1
10

Gungahlin

ACT 2912 · 8,586 residents

144 ha of parkland within 1 km · 3 separate parks · largest 139 ha

C 90.0
11

Acton

ACT 2601 · 2,848 residents

130 ha of parkland within 1 km · 8 separate parks · largest 94 ha

D 88.9
12

Denman Prospect

ACT 2611 · 2,759 residents

105 ha of parkland within 1 km · 2 separate parks · largest 100 ha

C 87.8
13

Cook

ACT 2614 · 2,965 residents

94 ha of parkland within 1 km · 2 separate parks · largest 94 ha

A 86.7
14

Latham

ACT 2615 · 3,767 residents

83 ha of parkland within 1 km · 1 separate park · largest 83 ha

C 85.6
15

Greenway

ACT 2900 · 4,129 residents

79 ha of parkland within 1 km · 6 separate parks · largest 61 ha

D 84.4

Ranked from 91 qualifying suburbs.

How we ranked these

Ranked entirely on the total area of parks, gardens and reserves within 1000 m of the suburb centre, percentile-ranked within Canberra's candidate pool. The number of separate parks is shown on every row and breaks ties, but does not otherwise move the order: percentile ranks record position rather than size, so a suburb with three times the parkland gains only a point or two, and a second weighted factor would decide the list while appearing to be a minor one. Area rather than a count of parks, because counting features rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same: measured in August 2026, Canberra held 394 mapped park features within 25 km of its centre against Sydney's 3,388, but 95.4 km² of park area against Sydney's 71.9. Each park counts for at most 3.14 km², the area of the circle itself, so one large reserve on the edge of the ring cannot decide the ranking. This measures public parkland you could walk to, not tree cover — a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here — and boundaries come from OpenStreetMap, so an unmapped park is invisible to it. See how we calculate for the full methodology.

Common questions about this ranking

What are the greenest suburbs in Canberra?

Casey tops the ranking with about 458 hectares of parkland within a kilometre of the suburb centre, across 6 separate parks. The 15 listed run from about 458 hectares down to 79. Parkland means public parks, gardens and reserves mapped in OpenStreetMap, measured as area rather than as a count of parks. It is not a measure of tree cover, so a suburb of large private gardens can be leafy without appearing here. These 15 suburbs came from a field of 91 eligible Canberra suburbs.

What makes a Canberra suburb 'greenest' here?

The total area of parks, gardens and nature reserves whose centre sits within 1,000 m of the centre of the suburb. It is a measure of parkland you could walk to, not of tree cover: a leafy street of large private gardens has no parkland in it and does not score.

Why rank on park area instead of the number of parks?

Because counting parks rates a dog park and a nature reserve the same. Measured across Australia in August 2026, Canberra had 394 park features within 25 km of its centre against Sydney's 3,388 — but 95.4 km2 of park area against Sydney's 71.9. Ranking on counts would have called the bush capital the least green city in the country.

Does the number of parks matter at all?

It is shown on every row and breaks ties, but it does not otherwise change the order. A weighted version was tried and dropped: scores are percentile ranks, which record position rather than size, so a suburb with three times the parkland of another gains only a point or two — and a factor meant to be minor ended up deciding the list.

How is a very large national park handled?

Each park counts for at most 3.14 km2, which is the area of the 1,000 m circle itself. A reserve larger than everything within walking distance of you cannot give you more green space than that area holds, and without the limit a single large reserve on the edge of the ring would decide the whole ranking.

Why isn't a suburb I know to be leafy on the Canberra list?

Most likely it has private gardens and street trees rather than public parkland, or its parks sit past the ring measured from the suburb centre. Park boundaries come from OpenStreetMap, so a park that has not been mapped is a park this ranking cannot see.

Same list in other cities

Related

Rankings last computed 28 September 2026. Recomputed after each ACARA schools data refresh.

Was the information on this page useful to you?

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or