Best Bundaberg suburbs for rental yield

Thabeban leads the house list at 4.9% gross — $33,000 a year on a $679,000 median. Bundaberg South leads the unit list, at 4.8%. Across both lists, gross yields span 4% to 4.9%. These 19 suburbs came from a field of 20 eligible Bundaberg suburbs.

Every eligible Bundaberg suburb, ordered by gross rental yield — median advertised weekly rent against median asking price — highest first. Growth, safety and walkability are shown beside each suburb but do not change the order. Houses and units are ranked separately because unit yields run systematically higher, so a combined list would tell a house investor very little.

This list used to blend growth, safety and walkability into the order, on the reasoning that sorting purely on yield returns the cheapest fringe — yield rises as price falls, and price falls partly because of bushfire, crime and flood exposure. Measured across eight capital lists, that turned out not to happen: the eligibility rules already exclude it. A suburb needs enough sale listings and enough rentals to have a real median, and has to clear a hazard floor before it is eligible at all, so the suburbs pure yield surfaces are established middle-ring ones rather than fringe estates. Mean safety across the lists moved by less than two percentile points, and in some capitals it improved. So the order now follows the number in the title, and growth, safety and rental depth are reported beside each suburb instead of quietly moving it. Two cautions the ranking cannot make for you: yield without capital growth is the classic value trap, and every figure here is gross — before strata, council rates, management fees, insurance and vacancy, which together typically take 1 to 1.5 percentage points off.

Highest-yielding Bundaberg suburbs (houses)

Detached and semi-detached houses only — units, townhouses and apartments are ranked separately below, and typically yield more.

1

Thabeban

QLD 4670 · 2,971 residents

4.9% gross yield · $640/wk on $679K · 27 rentals · 70/100 safety

C 61.3
2

Walkervale

QLD 4670 · 2,981 residents

4.9% gross yield · $560/wk on $600K · 11 rentals · 66/100 safety

C 60.7
3

Norville

QLD 4670 · 2,476 residents

4.9% gross yield · $600/wk on $634K · 11 rentals · 68/100 safety

C 61.5
4

Bundaberg East

QLD 4670 · 2,839 residents

4.9% gross yield · $610/wk on $650K · 5 rentals · 60/100 safety

D 61.0
5

Kepnock

QLD 4670 · 4,501 residents

4.8% gross yield · $630/wk on $689K · 21 rentals · 68/100 safety

C 59.4
6

Bundaberg South

QLD 4670 · 3,494 residents

4.7% gross yield · $565/wk on $629K · 28 rentals · 59/100 safety

D 58.4
7

Bundaberg North

QLD 4670 · 5,563 residents

4.7% gross yield · $580/wk on $638K · 20 rentals · 64/100 safety

D 59.1
8

Avoca

QLD 4670 · 4,912 residents

4.7% gross yield · $660/wk on $734K · 17 rentals · 66/100 safety

C 58.5
9

Svensson Heights

QLD 4670 · 3,334 residents

4.6% gross yield · $590/wk on $665K · 14 rentals · 68/100 safety

C 57.7
10

Avenell Heights

QLD 4670 · 5,028 residents

4.5% gross yield · $610/wk on $699K · 23 rentals · 68/100 safety

C 56.7
11

Millbank

QLD 4670 · 2,499 residents

4.5% gross yield · $595/wk on $684K · 11 rentals · 64/100 safety

C 56.5
12

Bundaberg West

QLD 4670 · 2,596 residents

4.5% gross yield · $605/wk on $697K · 6 rentals · 54/100 safety

D 56.4
13

Kalkie

QLD 4670 · 2,968 residents

4.3% gross yield · $665/wk on $807K · 10 rentals · 82/100 safety

B 53.6
14

Bargara

QLD 4670 · 8,883 residents

4.1% gross yield · $775/wk on $995K · 82 rentals · 63/100 safety

C 50.6
15

Burnett Heads

QLD 4670 · 2,908 residents

4.1% gross yield · $625/wk on $790K · 16 rentals · 74/100 safety

C 51.5

Ranked from 20 qualifying suburbs.

Highest-yielding Bundaberg suburbs (units)

Units, apartments and townhouses. Yields here run above the house list — strata costs, which gross yield doesn't deduct, are also higher.

Ranked from 4 qualifying suburbs.

How we ranked these

100% gross rental yield (median advertised rent × 52 ÷ median asking price), and nothing else: the order follows the yield figure shown against each suburb. Growth, safety, walkability and rental depth are reported per suburb but do not change the order; equal yields are broken by the deeper rental market. Houses and units are ranked separately because unit yields run systematically higher. Yields are gross: before strata, rates, management, insurance and vacancy. See how we calculate for the full methodology.

Common questions about this ranking

What are the best Bundaberg suburbs for rental yield?

Thabeban leads the house list at 4.9% gross — $33,000 a year on a $679,000 median. Bundaberg South leads the unit list, at 4.8%. Across both lists, gross yields span 4% to 4.9%. These 19 suburbs came from a field of 20 eligible Bundaberg suburbs.

How is this ranking ordered?

By gross rental yield alone — median advertised weekly rent × 52, divided by median asking price — highest first. Growth, safety, walkability and the depth of the rental market are shown for every Bundaberg suburb in the list, but they do not move it up or down. Where two suburbs have the same yield, the one with the deeper rental market is listed first.

Doesn't sorting by yield alone just surface the cheapest, riskiest suburbs?

It is the obvious worry, and this list was blended for that reason until September 2026 — yield rises as price falls, and price falls partly because of bushfire, crime and flood exposure. Measured across eight capital lists, it did not happen. To be eligible a suburb needs enough sale listings and enough advertised rentals to have a real median, and it has to clear a hazard floor, which together already exclude the thin fringe. Ordering purely on yield moved average safety across the lists by under two percentile points, and in some capitals it improved. So Bundaberg is now ordered by the number in the title. The caution that does still apply is the value trap: a high yield with no capital growth can still be a poor investment, which is why growth is shown beside every suburb.

Is this a gross or net yield?

Gross. It does not deduct strata or body-corporate fees, council rates, water, landlord insurance, property management (typically 5 to 8 percent of rent), maintenance, or vacancy between tenancies. Net yield after those costs is commonly 1 to 1.5 percentage points lower and varies far more by individual property than by suburb. Treat these figures as a way to compare suburbs, not as a projected return on a specific purchase.

Why are houses and units ranked separately?

Unit yields run systematically higher than house yields in the same suburb — units cost less to buy but rent for proportionally more. Blending them into one list would fill it almost entirely with units and tell a house investor nothing. Note that units also carry strata fees, which gross yield doesn't deduct, so the gap narrows on a net basis.

Which suburbs are eligible for the ranking?

A suburb needs at least 5 sale listings and 5 rental listings of the property type in the last 6 months, so both sides of the ratio rest on a real sample rather than one or two advertisements. It also has to clear a combined bushfire, crime and flood safety floor. Suburbs below either threshold are excluded, not penalised.

How often is this list updated?

The top 15 is recomputed after each property-listings refresh — monthly on the 1st. Both the rent and the price side come from the same six-month window of public listings, so the two halves of the ratio always cover the same period.

Same list in other cities

Related

Rankings last computed 24 October 2026. Recomputed after each ACARA schools data refresh.

Was the information on this page useful to you?

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or